[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150927180633.GA29466@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 19:06:33 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@...e.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...n.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/efi: Map EFI memmap entries in-order at runtime
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 09:30:48AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sep 26, 2015 1:19 PM, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sadly a lot of firmware is known to fail in that configuration :( That was very much our guest choice.
> >
>
> Why can't we map everything completely 1:1 (VA = PA) and call the
> setVA thing but pass it literally the identity.
Last time I tried this I found that some firmware makes assumptions
about having high addresses.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists