linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cxl: Don't remove AFUs/vPHBs in cxl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Sep 2015 08:32:48 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@...sung.com,
	Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl: Don't remove AFUs/vPHBs in cxl_reset

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:18:41PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> From: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
> 
> commit 4e1efb403c1c016ae831bd9988a7d2e5e0af41a0 upstream.
> 
> If the driver doesn't participate in EEH, the AFUs will be removed
> by cxl_remove, which will be invoked by EEH.
> 
> If the driver does particpate in EEH, the vPHB needs to stick around
> so that the it can particpate.
> 
> In both cases, we shouldn't remove the AFU/vPHB.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.1.9

Thanks for this, now applied.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/