[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150928000515.GA34421@google.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 17:05:15 -0700
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: nand: pxa3xx-nand: prevent DFI bus lockup on
removal
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:19:07PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> writes:
>
> > After the conversion of pxa architecture to common clock framework, the
> > NAND clock can be disabled on driver exit.
> >
> > In this case, it happens that if the driver used the NAND and set the
> > DFI arbitration bit, the next access to a static memory controller area,
> > such as an ethernet card, will stall the system bus, and the core will
> > be stalled forever.
> >
> > This is especially true on pxa31x SoCs, where the NDCR was augmented
> > with a new bit to prevent this lockups by giving full ownership of the
> > DFI arbiter to the SMC, in change SCr#6.
> >
> > Fix this by clearing the DFI arbritration bit in driver exit. This
> > effectively prevents a lockup on zylonite when removing pxa3xx-nand
> > module, and using ethernet afterwards.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> Hi Brian,
>
> Are you happy with this patch, and if so could you queue it please ?
It looks OK to me, but it doesn't apply to the latest l2-mtd.git. Am I
missing something? I didn't try too hard to work out the conflict
myself.
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists