[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150928093006.GT21513@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:30:06 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.3-rc3
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 08:57:44AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > JFYI, when comparing v4.3-rc3[1] to v4.3-rc2[3], the summaries are:
> > - build errors: +8/-12
>
> + error: No rule to make target include/config/auto.conf: => N/A
>
> arm-randconfig
Not every randconfig failure is a kernel problem. Here's an example:
Physical address of main memory (PHYS_OFFSET) [] (NEW) aborted!
Console input/output is redirected. Run 'make oldconfig' to update configuration.
This needs someone to provide a value, which means these failures are
not in fact failures of the kernel, but a failure of the build system
to anticipate that there may be Kconfig questions that need input.
So, these ones should be ignored.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists