[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <56092E98.9000103@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:12:08 +0200
From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: assign signed result to unsigned variable
On 09/28/2015 02:07 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> +// Options: --include-headers --all-includes
>
> How do you think about the reuse of the parameter "--recursive-includes" here?
Last time I have tried it, kernel source check took more than 10 hours, so I
gave up.
Regards
Andrzej
>
> Will the list of checked function calls become more complete then?
>
> Regards,
> Markus
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists