[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87si5ymjki.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:26:37 -0700
From: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: bcm2835: Add the auxiliary clocks to the device tree.
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> writes:
> On 09/10/2015 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> These will be used for enabling UART1, SPI1, and SPI2.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835.dtsi
>
>> + aux_clocks: aux-clocks@...e215004 {
>> + compatible = "brcm,bcm2835-aux-clock";
>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>> + reg = <0x7e215004 0x4>;
>
> Actually, I take back the ack on this patch. This HW module has two
> registers. The reg property should include both of those registers so
> that if SW needs to start using the other register at some time in the
> future, the entire set of registers is already represented in DT.
If I changed it to "reg = <0x7e215000 0x8>" and use a #define for the
clock register offset in patch 2/3, would I then have your ack?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (819 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists