[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1443514791.5403.12.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:19:51 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v4.2+ regression] fd7a4bed sched, rt: Convert switched_{from,
to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks
On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 04:17 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I bumped into an odd futextest regression, and finally bisected it to
> $subject. I haven't poked at it yet, chasing down and confirming the
> little bugger munched the day.
homer:/home/git/futextest/functional # ./futex_requeue_pi -c -b -o -t 500000 -v 2 2>&1|egrep 'exit|Blocker'
INFO: Waiter 0: exiting with 0
INFO: Waiter 1: exiting with 0
INFO: Waiter 2: exiting with 0
INFO: Waiter 3: exiting with 0
INFO: Waiter 4: exiting with 0
INFO: Waiter 5: exiting with 0
INFO: Waiter 6: exiting with 0
INFO: Waiter 7: exiting with 0
INFO: Waiter 8: exiting with 0
INFO: Waiter 9: exiting with 0
INFO: Waker: exiting with 0
INFO: Blocker: Calling futex_wait()
Well now, it _seems_ you're innocent Peter. Waker can call futex_wake()
before blocker calls futex_wait(), leaving poor blocker stranded.
Adding atomic_inc(&waiters_blocked) to blocker, and telling wakers to
expect one more when a blocker exists seems to have fixed it up.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists