linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] watchdog: Always evaluate new timeout against min

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:51:02 +0200
From:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Timo Kokkonen <timo.kokkonen@...code.fi>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] watchdog: Always evaluate new timeout against
 min_timeout

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 01:27:24AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Up to now, a new timeout value is only evaluated against min_timeout
> if max_timeout is provided. This does not really make sense; a driver
> can have a minimum timeout even if it does not have a maximum timeout.
> Ensure that it is not smaller than min_timeout, even if max_timeout
> is not set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/