Since we stopped setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE, there is no need to mask it out of preempt_count() tests. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) --- include/linux/preempt.h | 3 +-- kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/include/linux/preempt.h +++ b/include/linux/preempt.h @@ -126,8 +126,7 @@ * Check whether we were atomic before we did preempt_disable(): * (used by the scheduler) */ -#define in_atomic_preempt_off() \ - ((preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) != PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET) +#define in_atomic_preempt_off() (preempt_count() != PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET) #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER) extern void preempt_count_add(int val); --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -7472,7 +7472,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void) #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP static inline int preempt_count_equals(int preempt_offset) { - int nested = (preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) + rcu_preempt_depth(); + int nested = preempt_count() + rcu_preempt_depth(); return (nested == preempt_offset); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/