[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150929102448.GA25560@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:24:48 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64/efi: Don't pad between EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME
regions
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 05:31:00PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.efi/822
>
> And more replies here:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.efi/820
Whatever we did think back then, it all is moot as long as some UEFI
vendors do funky crap or the spec has documentation holes.
So we need a reality check and just do exactly what the OS does with
which UEFI writers are testing with. Be it windoze, be it some open
firmware testing tool or whatever. Provided there's even a tool with
which UEFI validation is done and it is used by everybody...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists