[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <560A6C8B.7080105@tomt.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:48:43 +0200
From: Andre Tomt <andre@...t.net>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
holger.hoffstaette@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.1 125/159] net: call rcu_read_lock early in
process_backlog
On 29. sep. 2015 12:21, Andre Tomt wrote:
> Meanwhile I'll revert both the mentioned net patches and see how it goes.
So that blew up as well, meaning it's not any of these two patches:
[PATCH 4.1 124/159] net: do not process device backlog during unregistration
[PATCH 4.1 125/159] net: call rcu_read_lock early in process_backlog
I'll be offline for a half+ day, I'll look into bisecting when back if
nobody has figured it out by then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists