[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU437-SMTP3713C761493B44BD461300804E0@phx.gbl>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:05:07 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>,
Wincy Van <fanwenyi0529@...il.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: nVMX: expose VPID capability to L1
On 9/29/15 6:39 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 29/09/2015 04:55, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> Expose VPID capability to L1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>> ---
>> v1 -> v2:
>> * set only VMX_VPID_EXTENT_GLOBAL_CONTEXT_BIT
> Thanks. I've checked more thoroughly your implementation against the
> SDM now, and there are a few missing things between this patch and the
> one that emulates INVVPID:
>
> - you're not setting bit 32 of the VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP MSR
>
> - you were not checking against the supported types in the
> implementation of the INVVPID instruction
>
> - the memory operand must always be read even if it isn't needed (e.g.,
> for type==global), similar to INVEPT
>
> - for single-context invalidation you're not checking that VPID != 0,
> though in practice that doesn't matter because we don't want to support
> single-context invalidation
>
> - you're always setting the MSR's bits to 1 even if !enable_vpid
>
> At this point it's better if you resend the whole nested VPID
> implementation, i.e. the following five patches:
>
> KVM: VMX: adjust interface to allocate/free_vpid
> KVM: VMX: introduce __vmx_flush_tlb to handle specific vpid
> KVM: nVMX: emulate the INVVPID instruction
> KVM: nVMX: nested VPID emulation
> KVM: nVMX: expose VPID capability to L1
>
> with the above issues fixed. Please also send kvm-unit-tests patches
> that tests for the error cases.
Ok, I will do this after the vacation(until 10.7) in my country. :-)
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists