[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150929131841.GC31582@lerouge>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:18:42 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...hat.com,
umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 05/11] sched: Add preempt argument to __schedule()
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:28:30AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> There is only a single PREEMPT_ACTIVE use in the regular __schedule()
> path and that is to circumvent the task->state check. Since the code
> setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE is the immediate caller of __schedule() we can
> replace this with a function argument.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists