linux-kernel - leds: inconsistent use of EXPORT_SYMBOL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <560A93B0.3070605@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:35:44 +0200
From:	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: leds: inconsistent use of EXPORT_SYMBOL_* macros

Hi Linus,

In drivers/leds/led-core.c some symbols are exported with
EXPORT_SYMBOL and other with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL macros.

It seems that this mess wasn't introduced intentionally, but rather
carelessly, as in case of led_blink_set() and led_stop_software_blink()
functions, where the former, which enables blinking, is exported with
EXPORT_SYMBOL, and the latter, which disables blinking, with
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.

It is also worth of noting that all symbols in drivers/led/led-class.c
are exported with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL, which implies that it is not
possible to register LED class device with non-GPL API, which in
turn rather eliminates non-GPL users of led-core API.

I'd like just confirm that in this case we are permitted to
switch to using EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL consequently in the LED core.

-- 
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/