[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <560A9672.9@electrozaur.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 16:47:30 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@...ctrozaur.com>
To: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@....com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
bhalevy@...marydata.com
CC: osd-dev@...n-osd.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/17] fs/exofs: remove unnecessary new_valid_dev check
On 09/28/2015 04:43 PM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> As new_valid_dev always returns 1, so !new_valid_dev check is not
> needed, remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@....com>
ACK-by: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@...ctrozaur.com>
Please submit this through some General tree like the vfs or mm-tree
Thanks
Boaz
> ---
> fs/exofs/namei.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exofs/namei.c b/fs/exofs/namei.c
> index 09a6bb1..994e078 100644
> --- a/fs/exofs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/exofs/namei.c
> @@ -80,9 +80,6 @@ static int exofs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode,
> struct inode *inode;
> int err;
>
> - if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> inode = exofs_new_inode(dir, mode);
> err = PTR_ERR(inode);
> if (!IS_ERR(inode)) {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists