[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150929141807.GB4401@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:18:07 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@...e.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...n.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/efi: Map EFI memmap entries in-order at runtime
On Tue, 29 Sep, at 12:41:23PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> OK, fair enough. I agree that setting the flag for 32-bit would be
> semantically correct. I will leave it to Matt to comment whether it is
> reasonable in terms of changes to other parts of the code.
It should be pretty minimal. Let me take a swing at the patch.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists