[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150929112839.41a634b0@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:28:39 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 05/11] sched: Add preempt argument to __schedule()
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:28:30 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> There is only a single PREEMPT_ACTIVE use in the regular __schedule()
> path and that is to circumvent the task->state check. Since the code
> setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE is the immediate caller of __schedule() we can
> replace this with a function argument.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists