[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <560ABDF6.1090804@citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:36:06 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@...rix.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
CC: <wei.liu2@...rix.com>, <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
<stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <roger.pau@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/20] xen/arm64: Add support for 64KB
page in Linux
On 29/09/15 17:33, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 29/09/15 17:27, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 07/09/15 16:33, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>> A branch based on the latest xentip/for-linus-4.3 can be found here:
>>>
>>> git://xenbits.xen.org/people/julieng/linux-arm.git branch xen-64k-v4
>>
>> This has too many conflicts with the
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git for-linus-4.4
>> branch.
>>
>> Please rebase.
>
> I was about to send a new version rebased (no changes in it so far
> except for rebasing purpose). I will do it on top of for-linus-4.4.
> I will also include the swiotlb changes at the end as it was reviewed by
> Stefano.
Thanks.
> BTW, some of the patches should, strictly speaking, go via the block and
> network subsystem. Although, they heavily depends on other patches in
> this series. Would it be fine to send all through xentip?
Yes, if they've been acked by the appropriate maintainer.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists