[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <560ACBC5.3090301@ezchip.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:35:01 -0400
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Gilad Ben Yossef <giladb@...hip.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/11] task_isolation: add debug boot flag
On 09/28/2015 06:40 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> If I were writing a program that used this feature, I think I'd want
> to know early that it's not going to work so I can tell the admin very
> loudly to fix it. Maybe just failing the prctl would be enough. If
> someone turns on the prctl and then changes their affinity, maybe we
> should treat it as though they're just asking for trouble and allow
> it.
Yes, the original Tilera implementation required the task to be
affinitized to a single, nohz_full cpu before you could call the
prctl() successfully. I think I will re-instate that for the patch series,
and if the user then re-affinitizes to a non-nohz_full core later,
well, "don't do that then".
--
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists