[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrW-JFTuEJJke0EMbj5xNKvdqm5aZaT-xV8QS8o+m7vxgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:22:04 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Use entire page for the per-cpu GDT only if paravirt-enabled
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:18 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> SGDT would be easy to use, and it is logical that it is faster since it reads an internal register. SIDT does too but unlike the GDT has a secondary limit (it can never be larger than 4096 bytes) and so all limits in the range 4095-65535 are exactly equivalent.
>
Using the IDT limit would have been a great ideal if Intel hadn't
decided to clobber it on every VM exit.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists