[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yw1xwpv9ou7x.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 21:18:10 +0100
From: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
To: Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Trivial clocksource driver
Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr> writes:
> On 29/09/2015 20:32, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Mason wrote:
>>
>>> I am trying to submit a new ARM port, and Arnd pointed out that the
>>> clocksource code could not live in arch/arm/$PLATFORM, but had to
>>> move to drivers/clocksource (and it had to support DT).
>>>
>>> Did I understand correctly? Is this the right place to submit code
>>> as provided below?
>>
>> Yes, drivers/clocksource is the right place. You just need to submit a
>> formal patch, which includes a proper subject line, changelog, plus
>> the necessary Makefile and Kconfig modifications.
>
> OK, I'll send a formal patch tomorrow.
> There are no Kconfig modifications, is that OK?
Why don't you use my driver? It's even simpler, and it works just fine
on the 87xx chip.
https://github.com/mansr/linux-tangox/blob/master/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-tangox.c
--
Måns Rullgård
mans@...sr.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists