[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150930190909.GA27570@krava.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 21:09:09 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, eranian@...gle.com,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to
sample_reg_masks
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> From e29aeeee7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks
>
> perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false.
> So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get picked up.
>
> Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition
> error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version
> in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists