[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1443646163-31316-5-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:49:23 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC 4/4] pid_namespace: disable_pid_allocation is unused for !CONFIG_PID_NS
disable_pid_allocation only has a single caller, in
kernel/pid_namespace.c, so when CONFIG_PID_NS=n we don't need it. I
don't think we need to #ifdef the declaration away, since we'll just
fail at link time rather than compile time, should
disable_pid_allocation ever grow a caller outside pid_namespace.c.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
---
kernel/pid.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
index d422ddae0484..c9b595517c4f 100644
--- a/kernel/pid.c
+++ b/kernel/pid.c
@@ -358,12 +358,14 @@ out_free:
return ERR_PTR(retval);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
void disable_pid_allocation(struct pid_namespace *ns)
{
spin_lock_irq(&pidmap_lock);
ns->nr_hashed &= ~PIDNS_HASH_ADDING;
spin_unlock_irq(&pidmap_lock);
}
+#endif
struct pid *find_pid_ns(int nr, struct pid_namespace *ns)
{
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists