[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87vbarehtn.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:08:20 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/vmwgfx: use kzalloc in vmw_surface_define_ioctl()
On Wed, Sep 30 2015, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi Rasmus,
>
> [auto build test results on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
>
>
> coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c:771:1-13: alloc with no test, possible model on line 817
>
> vim +771 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
>
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 765
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 766 srf->sizes = kmalloc(srf->num_sizes * sizeof(*srf->sizes), GFP_KERNEL);
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 767 if (unlikely(srf->sizes == NULL)) {
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 768 ret = -ENOMEM;
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 769 goto out_no_sizes;
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 770 }
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 @771 srf->offsets = kmalloc(srf->num_sizes * sizeof(*srf->offsets),
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 772 GFP_KERNEL);
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 773 if (unlikely(srf->sizes == NULL)) {
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 774 ret = -ENOMEM;
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 775 goto out_no_offsets;
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 776 }
> 543831cf Thomas Hellstrom 2012-11-20 777
Wauv, that was fast. So, I'm pretty sure this has nothing to do with the
patch I just sent, but there's a bug nevertheless. The NULL test has
been copy-pasted from just above, but we're testing srf->sizes again,
not srf->offsets which we just tried to allocate.
Subject: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: check kmalloc return value
srf->sizes has been allocated and checked a few lines above; fix up
the copy-pasto so that we check srf->offsets.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
index 64b50409fa07..0cf0055e0e08 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ int vmw_surface_define_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
}
srf->offsets = kmalloc(srf->num_sizes * sizeof(*srf->offsets),
GFP_KERNEL);
- if (unlikely(srf->sizes == NULL)) {
+ if (unlikely(srf->offsets == NULL)) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out_no_offsets;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists