[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <560C5469.5010704@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:30:17 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>, willy@...ux.intel.com
CC: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance
On 09/17/2015 10:24 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 08/19/2015 01:46 AM, Al Viro wrote:
>>> or mapping->a_ops->direct_IO() returned more
>>>> than 'count'.
>> Was there DAX involved? ->direct_IO() in there is blkdev_direct_IO(),
>> which takes rather different paths in those cases...
>>
>
> So I've traced this all the way back to dax_io(). I can trigger this with:
>
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 93bf2f9..2cdb8a5 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ static ssize_t dax_io(struct inode *inode, struct iov_iter *iter,
> if (need_wmb)
> wmb_pmem();
>
> + WARN_ON((pos == start) && (pos - start > iov_iter_count(iter)));
> return (pos == start) ? retval : pos - start;
> }
>
> So it seems that iter gets moved twice here: once in dax_io(), and once again
> back at generic_file_read_iter().
>
> I don't see how it ever worked. Am I missing something?
Ping?
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists