linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] drivers:mtd:UBI: add bakvol module for MLC NAND paired page issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:55:20 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo) 
	<beanhuo@...ron.com>, "dedekind1@...il.com" <dedekind1@...il.com>,
	"adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	"baruch@...s.co.il" <baruch@...s.co.il>,
	"asierra@...-inc.com" <asierra@...-inc.com>,
	"guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com" <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
	"gsi@...x.de" <gsi@...x.de>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Frank Liu 刘群 (frankliu) 
	<frankliu@...ron.com>, Andrea Scian <rnd4@...e-tech.it>,
	Karl Zhang 张双锣 (karlzhang) 
	<karlzhang@...ron.com>,
	Iwo Mergler <Iwo.Mergler@...commwireless.com>,
	"Jeff Lauruhn (jlauruhn)" <jlauruhn@...ron.com>,
	Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] drivers:mtd:UBI: add bakvol module for MLC NAND
 paired page issue

Bean,

Am 30.09.2015 um 07:31 schrieb Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo):
>> As stated before, using OOB in UBI is not going to happen unless proven that
>> there is absolutely no other way to solve the paired pages problem.
>>
>> Nacked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
>>
>> Sorry,
>> //Richard
> 
> Hi, Richard
> Thanks for your concern. I am a new patch submitter.
> Can you tell me Nacked-by means?

I basically means that I'm (as maintainer) really unhappy with this patches
and don't see a way to get them merged as the whole concept is not acceptable.

> By the way, Do you review my patches series ? I don't backup duplicated data in OOB .
> Can you specify which sector codes ? so that I can explain it in detail.

Okay. Maybe both Boris and I misread your code, can you please explain in detail
what functions like check_original_data() or mtd_write_dual_plane_oob() do?

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/