[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509300925420.4500@nanos>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:26:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc: y2038@...ts.linaro.org, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>,
linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com,
Shradha Shah <sshah@...arflare.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] net: sfc: avoid using timespec
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The sfc driver internally uses a time format based on 32-bit (unsigned)
> seconds and 32-bit nanoseconds. This means it will overflow in 2106,
> but the value we pass into it is a signed 32-bit tv_sec that already
> overflows in 2038 to a negative value.
>
> This patch changes the logic to use the lower 32 bits of the timespec64
> tv_sec in efx_ptp_ns_to_s_ns, which will have the correct value beyond the overflow.
> While this does not change any of the register values, it lets us
> keep using the driver after we deprecate the use of the timespec type
> in the kernel.
>
> In the efx_ptp_process_times function, the change to use timespec64
> is similar, in that the tv_sec portion is ignored anyway and we only
> care about the nanosecond portion that remains unchanged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists