[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <560B9145.6070606@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:37:41 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Faerber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable WiFi-Ex as a module instead
built-in
On 30.09.2015 16:22, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On 09/30/2015 02:36 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29.09.2015 21:42, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> The Marvell WiFi-Ex driver tries to load a firmware on probe. So if the
>>> driver is built-in and probed before a firmware is available, this is
>>> not loaded and the chip does not work.
>>>
>>> This happens for example if an initramfs isn't used since the driver is
>>> probed before the root filesystem is mounted.
>>>
>>> Change the default config since the driver isn't needed for machines to
>>> boot and is more convenient to have it enabled as a module to avoid
>>> requiring an initramfs or to have the firmware built into the kernel.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> The user-space can always initiate re-probing of device - just re-bind
>
> It is true that you can force a re-probing from user-space by doing:
>
> $ echo "mmc2:0001:1" > /sys/bus/sdio/drivers/mwifiex_sdio/unbind
> $ echo "mmc2:0001:1" > /sys/bus/sdio/drivers/mwifiex_sdio/bind
I suppose the unbind won't be needed, because device aborted the
probe... so only one another bind.
>
> but:
>
> a) This is not obvious. In fact, I didn't think that possibility
> before you mentioned and I've been using Linux for many years :)
Eh, questionable. Obvious for me :)
>
> b) This is not something that isn't done automatically by init systems.
Right.
>
> So what users will see is that the driver was probed successfully but
> the firmware fails to load later (since the driver users the async
> request_firmware_nowait function to request the firmware).
Okay.
>
>> it. However I assume that driver cannot work without firmware?
>>
>
> Yes, it doesn't. I explained this in the commit message. Do you
> think it should be made more clear?
No, its OK, I agree.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists