[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150930124250.GB4704@gcs-HP-Notebook>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 18:12:50 +0530
From: Chandra Gorentla <csgorentla@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, johnny.kim@...el.com,
rachel.kim@...el.com, dean.lee@...el.com, chris.park@...el.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: staging: wilc1000: Replace message queue
with standard Linux lists
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 05:31:53AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:43:55PM +0530, Chandra S Gorentla wrote:
> > - The message queue is replaced with standard Linux linked list
> > - kmem_cache is used for list members
> > - A check for return value of receive method is added
> > - GFP_ATOMIC is changed to GFP_KERNEL
> > - A few other related minor changes
>
> These should be listed and explained.
OK. I will try to send seperate patches.
>
> >
> > while (1) {
> > - wilc_mq_recv(&gMsgQHostIF, &msg, sizeof(struct host_if_msg), &u32Ret);
> > + ret = wilc_mq_recv(&gMsgQHostIF, &msg,
> > + sizeof(struct host_if_msg), &u32Ret);
> > + if (ret)
> > + continue;
> > +
>
> I asked before if this was a forever loop and never got a response.
> Also what does this have to do with list macros?
The only exit condition of this loop is to receive a message
'HOST_IF_MSG_EXIT'. If this check is not there and 'wilc_mq_recv'
returns an error, the switch case below it will be executed for
the previously received message.
I will send this change in a different patch.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists