[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1443621946-8712-2-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:05:41 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "regulator: core: Handle full constraints systems when resolving supplies"
This reverts commit 9f7e25edb1575a6d2363dc003f9cc09d840657e2.
When a regulator A is registered and is supplied by regulator B which is
not yet registered then a regulator_get on regulator A will set the As
supply to the dummy regulator. This is not correct, we should return
-EPROBE_DEFER instead as done without this patch.
Of course reverting this patch brings back the issue it fixed, so this
is not a solution, but what is the correct solution?
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 7849187..bd9db70 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1403,13 +1403,9 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
return 0;
}
- if (have_full_constraints()) {
- r = dummy_regulator_rdev;
- } else {
- dev_err(dev, "Failed to resolve %s-supply for %s\n",
- rdev->supply_name, rdev->desc->name);
- return -EPROBE_DEFER;
- }
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to resolve %s-supply for %s\n",
+ rdev->supply_name, rdev->desc->name);
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
}
/* Recursively resolve the supply of the supply */
--
2.5.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists