[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509301650150.4500@nanos>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:53:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] net: mvneta: Switch to per-CPU irq and make
rxq_def useful
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> I also reorganized the series, the 3 first patches should go through
> the irq subsystem, whereas the 4 others should go to the network
> subsystem.
>
> However, there is a runtime dependency between the two parts. Patch 5
> depend on the patch 3 to be able to use the percpu irq.
The first 3 are good to go from my side. To avoid merge window
dependencies, I'll create a branch irq/for-net with these 3 patches
and merge that into irq/core.
So if the network folks want to pick up the rest, they can merge in
that branch as well.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists