| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150930154413.GO3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:44:13 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Meyer, Mike" <Mike.Meyer@...adata.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix task and run queue run_delay inconsistencies
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:37:18AM +0000, Meyer, Mike wrote:
> During evaluation of some performance data, it was discovered thread
> and run queue run_delay accounting data was inconsistent with the other
> accounting data that was collected. Further investigation found under
> certain circumstances execution time was leaking into the task and
> run queue accounting of run_delay.
>
> Consider the following sequence:
>
> a. thread is running.
> b. thread moves beween cgroups, changes scheduling class or priority.
> c. thread sleeps OR
> d. thread involuntarily gives up cpu.
>
> a. implies:
>
> thread->sched_info.last_queued = 0
>
> a. and b. results in the following:
>
> 1. dequeue_task(rq, thread)
>
> sched_info_dequeued(rq, thread)
> delta = 0
>
> sched_info_reset_dequeued(thread)
> thread->sched_info.last_queued = 0
>
> thread->sched_info.run_delay += delta
>
> 2. enqueue_task(rq, thread)
>
> sched_info_queued(rq, thread)
>
> /* thread is still on cpu at this point. */
> thread->sched_info.last_queued = task_rq(thread)->clock;
>
> c. results in:
>
> dequeue_task(rq, thread)
>
> sched_info_dequeued(rq, thread)
>
> /* delta is execution time not run_delay. */
> delta = task_rq(thread)->clock - thread->sched_info.last_queued
>
> sched_info_reset_dequeued(thread)
> thread->sched_info.last_queued = 0
>
> thread->sched_info.run_delay += delta
>
> Since thread was running between enqueue_task(rq, thread) and
> dequeue_task(rq, thread), the delta above is really execution
> time and not run_delay.
>
> d. results in:
>
> __sched_info_switch(thread, next_thread)
>
> sched_info_depart(rq, thread)
>
> sched_info_queued(rq, thread)
>
> /* last_queued not updated due to being non-zero */
> return
>
> Since thread was running between enqueue_task(rq, thread) and
> __sched_info_switch(thread, next_thread), the execution time
> between enqueue_task(rq, thread) and
> __sched_info_switch(thread, next_thread) now will become
> associated with run_delay due to when last_queued was last updated.
>
> The proposed patch addresses the issue by calling
> sched_info_reset_dequeued(thread) following the call to
> enqueue_task(rq, thread) for running threads in situations in which
> thread->sched_info.last_queued should remain 0.
Would something like the below; which avoids calling
sched_info_{de,}queued() for these sites also work?
It even shrinks the code (due to inlining {en,de}queue_task()):
$ size defconfig-build/kernel/sched/core.o defconfig-build/kernel/sched/core.o.orig
text data bss dec hex filename
64019 23378 2344 89741 15e8d defconfig-build/kernel/sched/core.o
64149 23378 2344 89871 15f0f defconfig-build/kernel/sched/core.o.orig
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 14 ++++++++------
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index fe819298c220..c5d579ad70cd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -827,17 +827,19 @@ static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p)
load->inv_weight = prio_to_wmult[prio];
}
-static void enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
+static inline void enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
update_rq_clock(rq);
- sched_info_queued(rq, p);
+ if (!(flags & ENQUEUE_TEMP))
+ sched_info_queued(rq, p);
p->sched_class->enqueue_task(rq, p, flags);
}
-static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
+static inline void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
update_rq_clock(rq);
- sched_info_dequeued(rq, p);
+ if (!(flags & DEQUEUE_TEMP))
+ sched_info_dequeued(rq, p);
p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
}
@@ -1178,7 +1180,7 @@ void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask)
* holding rq->lock.
*/
lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
- dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_TEMP);
}
if (running)
put_prev_task(rq, p);
@@ -1188,7 +1190,7 @@ void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask)
if (running)
p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
if (queued)
- enqueue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ enqueue_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_TEMP);
}
/*
@@ -3300,7 +3302,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(default_wake_function);
*/
void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
{
- int oldprio, queued, running, enqueue_flag = 0;
+ int oldprio, queued, running, enqueue_flag = ENQUEUE_TEMP;
struct rq *rq;
const struct sched_class *prev_class;
@@ -3332,7 +3334,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
queued = task_on_rq_queued(p);
running = task_current(rq, p);
if (queued)
- dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_TEMP);
if (running)
put_prev_task(rq, p);
@@ -3350,7 +3352,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
if (!dl_prio(p->normal_prio) ||
(pi_task && dl_entity_preempt(&pi_task->dl, &p->dl))) {
p->dl.dl_boosted = 1;
- enqueue_flag = ENQUEUE_REPLENISH;
+ enqueue_flag |= ENQUEUE_REPLENISH;
} else
p->dl.dl_boosted = 0;
p->sched_class = &dl_sched_class;
@@ -3358,7 +3360,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
if (dl_prio(oldprio))
p->dl.dl_boosted = 0;
if (oldprio < prio)
- enqueue_flag = ENQUEUE_HEAD;
+ enqueue_flag |= ENQUEUE_HEAD;
p->sched_class = &rt_sched_class;
} else {
if (dl_prio(oldprio))
@@ -3410,7 +3412,7 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
}
queued = task_on_rq_queued(p);
if (queued)
- dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_TEMP);
p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice);
set_load_weight(p);
@@ -3419,7 +3421,7 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
delta = p->prio - old_prio;
if (queued) {
- enqueue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ enqueue_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_TEMP);
/*
* If the task increased its priority or is running and
* lowered its priority, then reschedule its CPU:
@@ -3921,7 +3923,7 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
queued = task_on_rq_queued(p);
running = task_current(rq, p);
if (queued)
- dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_TEMP);
if (running)
put_prev_task(rq, p);
@@ -3931,11 +3933,15 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
if (running)
p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
if (queued) {
+ int enqueue_flags = ENQUEUE_TEMP;
/*
* We enqueue to tail when the priority of a task is
* increased (user space view).
*/
- enqueue_task(rq, p, oldprio <= p->prio ? ENQUEUE_HEAD : 0);
+ if (oldprio <= p->prio)
+ enqueue_flags |= ENQUEUE_HEAD;
+
+ enqueue_task(rq, p, enqueue_flags);
}
check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, oldprio);
@@ -5084,7 +5090,7 @@ void sched_setnuma(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
running = task_current(rq, p);
if (queued)
- dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_TEMP);
if (running)
put_prev_task(rq, p);
@@ -5093,7 +5099,7 @@ void sched_setnuma(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
if (running)
p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
if (queued)
- enqueue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ enqueue_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_TEMP);
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
@@ -7712,7 +7718,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
queued = task_on_rq_queued(tsk);
if (queued)
- dequeue_task(rq, tsk, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, tsk, DEQUEUE_TEMP);
if (unlikely(running))
put_prev_task(rq, tsk);
@@ -7736,7 +7742,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
if (unlikely(running))
tsk->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
if (queued)
- enqueue_task(rq, tsk, 0);
+ enqueue_task(rq, tsk, ENQUEUE_TEMP);
task_rq_unlock(rq, tsk, &flags);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index af6f252e7e34..d97a8d1abc66 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1150,16 +1150,18 @@ static const u32 prio_to_wmult[40] = {
/* 15 */ 119304647, 148102320, 186737708, 238609294, 286331153,
};
-#define ENQUEUE_WAKEUP 1
-#define ENQUEUE_HEAD 2
+#define ENQUEUE_WAKEUP 0x01
+#define ENQUEUE_HEAD 0x02
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-#define ENQUEUE_WAKING 4 /* sched_class::task_waking was called */
+#define ENQUEUE_WAKING 0x04 /* sched_class::task_waking was called */
#else
-#define ENQUEUE_WAKING 0
+#define ENQUEUE_WAKING 0x00
#endif
-#define ENQUEUE_REPLENISH 8
+#define ENQUEUE_REPLENISH 0x08
+#define ENQUEUE_TEMP 0x10
-#define DEQUEUE_SLEEP 1
+#define DEQUEUE_SLEEP 0x01
+#define DEQUEUE_TEMP 0x02
#define RETRY_TASK ((void *)-1UL)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists