linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] coredump: make SIGNAL_GROUP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 1 Oct 2015 01:12:38 +0900
From:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:	oleg@...hat.com
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com, kwalker@...hat.com,
	mhocko@...nel.org, skozina@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] coredump: make SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP more friendly to oom-killer

Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> This patch just makes the SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP check in task_will_free_mem()
> a bit more correct wrt CLONE_VM tasks, nothing more.

OK. Then, that's out of what I can understand. But I wish for
some description to PATCH 2/2 about why to change from
"do { } while_each_thread()" to "for_each_thread() { }"
because they seem to traverse differently.



#define __for_each_thread(signal, t)    \
	list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &(signal)->thread_head, thread_node)

#define for_each_thread(p, t)           \
	__for_each_thread((p)->signal, t)

static inline struct task_struct *next_thread(const struct task_struct *p)
{
	return list_entry_rcu(p->thread_group.next,
			      struct task_struct, thread_group);
}

#define while_each_thread(g, t) \
	while ((t = next_thread(t)) != g)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/