[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150930164339.GQ32625@saruman.tx.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:43:39 -0500
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
CC: <balbi@...com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] usb: gadget: atmel: access the PMC using regmap
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:39:03PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 30/09/2015 18:31, Felipe Balbi a écrit :
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:11:08PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >> Use regmap to access the PMC to avoid using at91_pmc_read and
> >> at91_pmc_write.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> >
> > can I take this through my tree or does it have any dependences with the rest of
> > the series ?
>
> Hi Felipe,
>
> Well, I have the feeling that these changes would require the regmap to
> be in place before using it. So yes, it has a strong dependency with the
> rest of the series (and DT modifications like the 06/16 patch actually).
>
> So, I think that Alexandre would agree with me that we should take the
> whole series with us through the arm-soc tree. An alternative would be
> to delay the inclusion of the USB part a little bit...
>
> Thanks for the heads-up Felipe, Bye,
hey no problem. I have no objections to $subject:
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists