[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150930164940.GB19988@esperanza>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:49:40 +0300
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] fs: charge pipe buffers to memcg
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 03:57:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 13:45:54 +0300 Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com> wrote:
>
> > Pipe buffers can be generated unrestrictedly by an unprivileged
> > userspace process, so they shouldn't go unaccounted.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/fs/pipe.c
> > +++ b/fs/pipe.c
> > @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> > int copied;
> >
> > if (!page) {
> > - page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER);
> > + page = alloc_kmem_pages(GFP_HIGHUSER, 0);
> > if (unlikely(!page)) {
> > ret = ret ? : -ENOMEM;
> > break;
>
> This seems broken. We have a page buffer page which has a weird
> ->mapcount. Now it gets stolen (generic_pipe_buf_steal()) and spliced
> into pagecache. Then the page gets mmapped and MM starts playing with
> its ->_mapcount?
Right you are! I completely forgot of vmsplice case. Surely, we need to
uncharge the page in the ->steal method and clear its PageKmem. Will fix
that.
Thanks,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists