[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLsYkwe2d3_6m6_0dwOkJfm-7knwp7WJJA7c4Qd9LBKpadB3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 17:16:43 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jon Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@....com>, Tor Jeremiassen <tor@...com>,
Al Grant <al.grant@....com>,
Paweł Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 19/20] coresight: etm3x: implementing perf's
user/kernel mode
On 30 September 2015 at 04:16, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> writes:
>
>> Configure tracers in accordance with the specification conveyed
>> by the perf cmd line tool. For example if only user space is
>> requested, configure the address range comparator with the kerne's
>> address range and set the 'exclude' bit, which will result in
>> tracing everything except the kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c
>> index 077b49714259..2f818dbde099 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c
>> @@ -320,6 +320,41 @@ static int etm_parse_event_config(struct etm_drvdata *drvdata,
>> {
>> u64 config = event->attr.config;
>>
>> + if (event->attr.exclude_kernel || event->attr.exclude_user) {
>> + u32 event_encoding;
>> + u32 flags = (1 << 0 | /* instruction execute*/
>> + 3 << 3 | /* ARM instruction */
>> + 0 << 5 | /* No data value comparison */
>> + 0 << 7 | /* No exact mach */
>> + 0 << 8 | /* Ignore context ID */
>> + 0 << 10); /* Security ignored */
>> +
>> + /* Bit 0 is address range comparator 1 */
>> + drvdata->enable_ctrl1 = ETMTECR1_ADDR_COMP_1;
>> +
>> + /* Bit 24 controls whether the address range should be
>> + * included or excluded.
>> + */
>> + if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
>> + drvdata->enable_ctrl1 |= BIT(24);
>
> Isn't there a privilege level based filtering (OS/USR) in ETM? Shouldn't
> ETMACTRn[10:12] have a setting for that?
Indeed - I'm working with people at ARM on a better solution.
>
>> +
>> + /* No need to worry about single address comparators */
>> + drvdata->enable_ctrl2 = 0x0;
>> +
>> + drvdata->addr_val[0] = (u32) _stext;
>> + drvdata->addr_val[1] = (u32) _etext;
>
> This doesn't cover kernel modules, afaict.
>
>> + drvdata->addr_acctype[0] = flags;
>> + drvdata->addr_acctype[1] = flags;
>> + drvdata->addr_type[0] = ETM_ADDR_TYPE_RANGE;
>> + drvdata->addr_type[1] = ETM_ADDR_TYPE_RANGE;
>> +
>> + event_encoding = 0x00 << 14 | /* Boolean function select A */
>> + 0x01 << 4 | /* Addr range comparator 0-7 */
>> + 0x00 << 0; /* Addr range comparator 1 */
>> +
>> + drvdata->enable_event = event_encoding;
>> + }
>> +
>> /*
>> * At this time only cycle accurate and timestamp options are
>> * available. As such clear everything else that may have been
>> @@ -362,6 +397,7 @@ static void etm_configure_cpu(void *info)
>> etm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->startstop_ctrl, ETMTSSCR);
>> etm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->enable_event, ETMTEEVR);
>> etm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->enable_ctrl1, ETMTECR1);
>> + etm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->enable_ctrl2, ETMTECR2);
>> etm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->fifofull_level, ETMFFLR);
>> for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nr_addr_cmp; i++) {
>> etm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->addr_val[i], ETMACVRn(i));
>> --
>> 1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists