[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <560CB98A.10107@tomt.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:41:46 +0200
From: Andre Tomt <andre@...t.net>
To: Holger Hoffstätte
<holger.hoffstaette@...glemail.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9
On 01. okt. 2015 00:37, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:59:43 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
>
>> for information, I've just upgraded 6 servers from Linux 4.1.8 to Linux
>> 4.1.9, and have some random soft lockup. If this can help :
>
> Congratulations! You're not the first one to get hit by this, but
> you are probably the first one to get a meaningful stacktrace! \o/
>
>> [ 204.478380] Call Trace:
>> [ 204.478381] <IRQ>
>> [ 204.478385] [<ffffffff81076121>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x43/0x4d
>> [ 204.478386] [<ffffffff810760de>] ? del_timer+0x4d/0x4d
>> [ 204.478388] [<ffffffff8107614b>] ? del_timer_sync+0x20/0x3d
>
> Can you try to revert
>
> [PATCH 4.1 157/159] inet: fix races with reqsk timers
>
> and see how that works for you? I'll do the same on my end. So far the
> only thing I ever could gleam was an rcu stall after cpuidle_enter(),
> but never anything regarding the timer - though it was definitely
> related to NIC activity after idle.
I'm running with this patch reverted now as well. 2 hours no issues so
far, but I can't conclude anything yet as I've seen it take up to 6+
hours to explode here. As a result the bisect was going veeery slowly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists