[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151001055157.GF7858@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:51:57 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Handle probe deferral from DT when
resolving supplies
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:30:52PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> When resolving regulator-regulator supplies we ignore probe deferral
> returns from regulator_dev_lookup() (such as are generated for DT when
> we can see a supply is registered) and just fall back to the dummy
> regulator if there are full constraints (as is the case for DT). This
> means that probe deferral is broken for DT systems, fix that by paying
> attention to -EPROBE_DEFER return codes like we do -ENODEV.
>
> A further patch will simplify this further, this is a minimal fix for
> the specific issue.
>
> Reported-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> Tested with my famous "I need to leave the house right now so haven't
> even tried building this yet" test plan - please let me know how this
> works for you.
Yes, this works as expected.
Tested-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists