Message-Id: <036E1E75-8E6A-4116-A648-A188A8458416@holtmann.org>
Date:	Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:54:58 +0200
From:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:	bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com
Cc:	"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Fengwei Yin <fengwei.yin@...aro.org>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_smd: Qualcomm WCNSS HCI driver

Hi Bjorn,

> The Qualcomm WCNSS chip provides two SMD channels to the BT core; one
> for command and one for event packets. This driver exposes the two
> channels as a hci device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig   |  11 +++
> drivers/bluetooth/Makefile  |   1 +
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_smd.c | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/net/bluetooth/hci.h |   1 +
> 4 files changed, 235 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/bluetooth/hci_smd.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig b/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig
> index 3d480d8c6111..1a2658f373b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig
> @@ -62,6 +62,17 @@ config BT_HCIBTSDIO
> 	  Say Y here to compile support for Bluetooth SDIO devices into the
> 	  kernel or say M to compile it as module (btsdio).
> 
> +config BT_HCISMD
> +	tristate "HCI Qualcomm SMD driver"
> +	depends on QCOM_SMD
> +	help
> +	  Qualcomm SMD HCI driver.
> +	  This driver is used to bridge HCI data onto the shared memory
> +	  channels to the WCNSS core.
> +
> +	  Say Y here to compile support for HCI over Qualcomm SMD into the
> +	  kernelor say M to compile as a module.
> +
> config BT_HCIUART
> 	tristate "HCI UART driver"
> 	depends on TTY
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile b/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile
> index 07c9cf381e5a..43c7dc8641ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUART)	+= btuart_cs.o
> 
> obj-$(CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB)	+= btusb.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BT_HCIBTSDIO)	+= btsdio.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_BT_HCISMD)		+= hci_smd.o

I wonder if choosing a name like btqcomsmd.ko would not be better here. For now I am fine with keeping hci_smd.ko since there are other issues here to be fixed first. Especially the kbuild test robot complained loudly.

> obj-$(CONFIG_BT_INTEL)		+= btintel.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BT_ATH3K)		+= ath3k.o
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_smd.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_smd.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e5748da2f902
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_smd.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2015, Sony Mobile Communications Inc.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
> + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/soc/qcom/smd.h>
> +#include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
> +#include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
> +#include <net/bluetooth/hci.h>

The hci.h include is not needed. If you do, then you are doing something fishy.

> +
> +static struct {
> +	struct qcom_smd_channel *acl_channel;
> +	struct qcom_smd_channel *cmd_channel;
> +
> +	struct hci_dev *hci;
> +} smd_hci;

A driver that only supports a single instance of a device and uses a global variable to do so is not a good idea. There should be no reason for this. Why is this done this way.

> +
> +static int smd_hci_recv(unsigned type, const void *data, size_t count)
> +{
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +	void *buf;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	skb = bt_skb_alloc(count, GFP_ATOMIC);

Is it required that this is GFP_ATOMIC or can this actually be GFP_KERNEL?

> +	if (!skb)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	buf = skb_put(skb, count);
> +	memcpy_fromio(buf, data, count);

Why is this a memcpy_fromio here?

> +
> +	skb->dev = (void *)smd_hci.hci;

This is no longer needed.

> +	bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type = type;
> +	skb_orphan(skb);
> +
> +	ret = hci_recv_frame(smd_hci.hci, skb);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		kfree_skb(skb);

This is a double kfree_skb here. The hci_recv_frame will consume the skb no matter what.

> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int smd_hci_acl_callback(struct qcom_smd_device *qsdev,
> +				const void *data,
> +				size_t count)
> +{
> +	return smd_hci_recv(HCI_ACLDATA_PKT, data, count);
> +}
> +
> +static int smd_hci_cmd_callback(struct qcom_smd_device *qsdev,
> +				const void *data,
> +				size_t count)
> +{
> +	return smd_hci_recv(HCI_EVENT_PKT, data, count);
> +}
> +
> +static int smd_hci_send(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type) {
> +	case HCI_ACLDATA_PKT:
> +	case HCI_SCODATA_PKT:
> +		ret = qcom_smd_send(smd_hci.acl_channel, skb->data, skb->len);
> +		break;
> +	case HCI_COMMAND_PKT:
> +		ret = qcom_smd_send(smd_hci.cmd_channel, skb->data, skb->len);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	kfree_skb(skb);

If you return an error, then the caller of hdev->send will free the skb.

> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int smd_hci_open(struct hci_dev *hci)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int smd_hci_close(struct hci_dev *hci)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}

These two need to at least handling the HCI_RUNNING flag setting and clearing like all the other drivers do.

> +
> +static int smd_hci_set_bdaddr(struct hci_dev *hci,
> +			      const bdaddr_t *bdaddr)
> +{
> +	u8 buf[12];
> +
> +	buf[0] = 0x0b;
> +	buf[1] = 0xfc;
> +	buf[2] = 0x9;
> +	buf[3] = 0x1;
> +	buf[4] = 0x2;

Use full 0x00 syntax here.

> +	buf[5] = sizeof(bdaddr_t);
> +	memcpy(buf + 6, bdaddr, sizeof(bdaddr_t));

We also need to be sure that this command only changes the BD_ADDR in RAM. It can not be persistent. When resetting / power cycle the controller it will fallback to its default.

> +
> +	return qcom_smd_send(smd_hci.cmd_channel, buf, sizeof(buf));

Use __hci_cmd_sync since that is what is suppose to be used in this callback. See the other drivers on how this is done.

I wonder if qca_set_bdaddr_rome is not actually the same command and you could just use that instead.

> +}
> +
> +static int smd_hci_register(void)
> +{
> +	struct hci_dev *hci;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (smd_hci.hci)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Wait for both channels to probe before registering */
> +	if (!smd_hci.acl_channel || !smd_hci.cmd_channel)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	hci = hci_alloc_dev();
> +	if (!hci)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hci->bus = HCI_SMD;
> +	hci->open = smd_hci_open;
> +	hci->close = smd_hci_close;
> +	hci->send = smd_hci_send;
> +	hci->set_bdaddr = smd_hci_set_bdaddr;
> +
> +	ret = hci_register_dev(hci);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		hci_free_dev(hci);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	smd_hci.hci = hci;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void smd_hci_unregister(void)
> +{
> +	/* Only unregister on the first remove call */
> +	if (!smd_hci.hci)
> +		return;
> +
> +	hci_unregister_dev(smd_hci.hci);
> +	hci_free_dev(smd_hci.hci);
> +	smd_hci.hci = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int smd_hci_acl_probe(struct qcom_smd_device *sdev)
> +{
> +	smd_hci.acl_channel = sdev->channel;
> +	smd_hci_register();
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int smd_hci_cmd_probe(struct qcom_smd_device *sdev)
> +{
> +	smd_hci.cmd_channel = sdev->channel;
> +	smd_hci_register();
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void smd_hci_acl_remove(struct qcom_smd_device *sdev)
> +{
> +	smd_hci.acl_channel = NULL;
> +	smd_hci_unregister();
> +}
> +
> +static void smd_hci_cmd_remove(struct qcom_smd_device *sdev)
> +{
> +	smd_hci.cmd_channel = NULL;
> +	smd_hci_unregister();
> +}
> +
> +static const struct qcom_smd_id smd_hci_acl_match[] = {
> +	{ .name = "APPS_RIVA_BT_ACL" },
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +static const struct qcom_smd_id smd_hci_cmd_match[] = {
> +	{ .name = "APPS_RIVA_BT_CMD" },
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +static struct qcom_smd_driver smd_hci_acl_driver = {
> +	.probe = smd_hci_acl_probe,
> +	.remove = smd_hci_acl_remove,
> +	.callback = smd_hci_acl_callback,
> +	.smd_match_table = smd_hci_acl_match,
> +	.driver  = {
> +		.name  = "qcom_smd_hci_acl",
> +		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static struct qcom_smd_driver smd_hci_cmd_driver = {
> +	.probe = smd_hci_cmd_probe,
> +	.remove = smd_hci_cmd_remove,
> +	.callback = smd_hci_cmd_callback,
> +	.smd_match_table = smd_hci_cmd_match,
> +	.driver  = {
> +		.name  = "qcom_smd_hci_cmd",
> +		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +module_qcom_smd_driver(smd_hci_acl_driver);
> +module_qcom_smd_driver(smd_hci_cmd_driver);

This is not going to fly. This turns it into two module_{init,exit} calls. That really does not work this way.

I mean why do you need two different drivers in the first place. I should be matching via a single qcom_smd_id in the first place. And you handle everything else in the probe() callback.

For me this is similar to the USB case where you actually have to claim to interfaces. We just lookup the other interface and claim it. It looks like SMD core functionality needs the same feature.

> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm SMD HCI driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> index 7ca6690355ea..ee5b2dd922f6 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
> #define HCI_RS232	4
> #define HCI_PCI		5
> #define HCI_SDIO	6
> +#define HCI_SMD		7

I would prefer if this come in a separate patch from the driver.

Regards

Marcel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists