[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201510011952.EEB78143.QHSMLOOVFOFJFt@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:52:28 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: oleg@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: rientjes@...gle.com, kwalker@...hat.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
skozina@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending()check in oom_kill_process()
David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > The fatal_signal_pending() was added to suppress unnecessary "sharing
> > same memory" message, but it can't 100% help anyway because it can be
> > false-negative; SIGKILL can be already dequeued.
> >
> > And worse, it can be false-positive due to exec or coredump. exec is
> > mostly fine, but coredump is not. It is possible that the group leader
> > has the pending SIGKILL because its sub-thread originated the coredump,
> > in this case we must not skip this process.
> >
> > We could probably add the additional ->group_exit_task check but this
> > pach just removes the wrong check along with pr_info().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>
Please s/pach/patch/ when applying.
Acked-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists