| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-0ce3cc008ec04258b6a6314b09f1a6012810881a@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 05:49:03 -0700
From: tip-bot for Ard Biesheuvel <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, leif.lindholm@...aro.org,
peterz@...radead.org, will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
msalter@...hat.com, efault@....de, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
matt.fleming@...el.com
Subject: [tip:core/urgent] arm64/efi:
Fix boot crash by not padding between EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME regions
Commit-ID: 0ce3cc008ec04258b6a6314b09f1a6012810881a
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/0ce3cc008ec04258b6a6314b09f1a6012810881a
Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 23:02:19 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:51:28 +0200
arm64/efi: Fix boot crash by not padding between EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME regions
The new Properties Table feature introduced in UEFIv2.5 may
split memory regions that cover PE/COFF memory images into
separate code and data regions. Since these regions only differ
in the type (runtime code vs runtime data) and the permission
bits, but not in the memory type attributes (UC/WC/WT/WB), the
spec does not require them to be aligned to 64 KB.
Since the relative offset of PE/COFF .text and .data segments
cannot be changed on the fly, this means that we can no longer
pad out those regions to be mappable using 64 KB pages.
Unfortunately, there is no annotation in the UEFI memory map
that identifies data regions that were split off from a code
region, so we must apply this logic to all adjacent runtime
regions whose attributes only differ in the permission bits.
So instead of rounding each memory region to 64 KB alignment at
both ends, only round down regions that are not directly
preceded by another runtime region with the same type
attributes. Since the UEFI spec does not mandate that the memory
map be sorted, this means we also need to sort it first.
Note that this change will result in all EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME
regions whose start addresses are not aligned to the OS page
size to be mapped with executable permissions (i.e., on kernels
compiled with 64 KB pages). However, since these mappings are
only active during the time that UEFI Runtime Services are being
invoked, the window for abuse is rather small.
Tested-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> [UEFI 2.4 only]
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.0+
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1443218539-7610-3-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 3 +-
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
index e8ca6ea..13671a9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
@@ -258,7 +258,8 @@ static bool __init efi_virtmap_init(void)
*/
if (!is_normal_ram(md))
prot = __pgprot(PROT_DEVICE_nGnRE);
- else if (md->type == EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE)
+ else if (md->type == EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE ||
+ !PAGE_ALIGNED(md->phys_addr))
prot = PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC;
else
prot = PAGE_KERNEL;
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c
index e29560e..950c87f 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/efi.h>
+#include <linux/sort.h>
#include <asm/efi.h>
#include "efistub.h"
@@ -305,6 +306,44 @@ fail:
*/
#define EFI_RT_VIRTUAL_BASE 0x40000000
+static int cmp_mem_desc(const void *l, const void *r)
+{
+ const efi_memory_desc_t *left = l, *right = r;
+
+ return (left->phys_addr > right->phys_addr) ? 1 : -1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Returns whether region @left ends exactly where region @right starts,
+ * or false if either argument is NULL.
+ */
+static bool regions_are_adjacent(efi_memory_desc_t *left,
+ efi_memory_desc_t *right)
+{
+ u64 left_end;
+
+ if (left == NULL || right == NULL)
+ return false;
+
+ left_end = left->phys_addr + left->num_pages * EFI_PAGE_SIZE;
+
+ return left_end == right->phys_addr;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Returns whether region @left and region @right have compatible memory type
+ * mapping attributes, and are both EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME regions.
+ */
+static bool regions_have_compatible_memory_type_attrs(efi_memory_desc_t *left,
+ efi_memory_desc_t *right)
+{
+ static const u64 mem_type_mask = EFI_MEMORY_WB | EFI_MEMORY_WT |
+ EFI_MEMORY_WC | EFI_MEMORY_UC |
+ EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME;
+
+ return ((left->attribute ^ right->attribute) & mem_type_mask) == 0;
+}
+
/*
* efi_get_virtmap() - create a virtual mapping for the EFI memory map
*
@@ -317,33 +356,52 @@ void efi_get_virtmap(efi_memory_desc_t *memory_map, unsigned long map_size,
int *count)
{
u64 efi_virt_base = EFI_RT_VIRTUAL_BASE;
- efi_memory_desc_t *out = runtime_map;
+ efi_memory_desc_t *in, *prev = NULL, *out = runtime_map;
int l;
- for (l = 0; l < map_size; l += desc_size) {
- efi_memory_desc_t *in = (void *)memory_map + l;
+ /*
+ * To work around potential issues with the Properties Table feature
+ * introduced in UEFI 2.5, which may split PE/COFF executable images
+ * in memory into several RuntimeServicesCode and RuntimeServicesData
+ * regions, we need to preserve the relative offsets between adjacent
+ * EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME regions with the same memory type attributes.
+ * The easiest way to find adjacent regions is to sort the memory map
+ * before traversing it.
+ */
+ sort(memory_map, map_size / desc_size, desc_size, cmp_mem_desc, NULL);
+
+ for (l = 0; l < map_size; l += desc_size, prev = in) {
u64 paddr, size;
+ in = (void *)memory_map + l;
if (!(in->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME))
continue;
+ paddr = in->phys_addr;
+ size = in->num_pages * EFI_PAGE_SIZE;
+
/*
* Make the mapping compatible with 64k pages: this allows
* a 4k page size kernel to kexec a 64k page size kernel and
* vice versa.
*/
- paddr = round_down(in->phys_addr, SZ_64K);
- size = round_up(in->num_pages * EFI_PAGE_SIZE +
- in->phys_addr - paddr, SZ_64K);
-
- /*
- * Avoid wasting memory on PTEs by choosing a virtual base that
- * is compatible with section mappings if this region has the
- * appropriate size and physical alignment. (Sections are 2 MB
- * on 4k granule kernels)
- */
- if (IS_ALIGNED(in->phys_addr, SZ_2M) && size >= SZ_2M)
- efi_virt_base = round_up(efi_virt_base, SZ_2M);
+ if (!regions_are_adjacent(prev, in) ||
+ !regions_have_compatible_memory_type_attrs(prev, in)) {
+
+ paddr = round_down(in->phys_addr, SZ_64K);
+ size += in->phys_addr - paddr;
+
+ /*
+ * Avoid wasting memory on PTEs by choosing a virtual
+ * base that is compatible with section mappings if this
+ * region has the appropriate size and physical
+ * alignment. (Sections are 2 MB on 4k granule kernels)
+ */
+ if (IS_ALIGNED(in->phys_addr, SZ_2M) && size >= SZ_2M)
+ efi_virt_base = round_up(efi_virt_base, SZ_2M);
+ else
+ efi_virt_base = round_up(efi_virt_base, SZ_64K);
+ }
in->virt_addr = efi_virt_base + in->phys_addr - paddr;
efi_virt_base += size;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists