[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <560D5227.8050600@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:32:55 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"srv_heupstream@...iatek.com" <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: mt8173: add timer node
On 01/10/15 15:33, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:13 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
[...]
>>
>> I think your are confusing the system counter with arch timers. System
>> counter is always-on, but the arch timers(logic implementing timers
>> comparators) might not be off when the processor is powered down.
>>
>> I think you need this timer and are using it for low power idle states
>> in which case you will use this as a clock event and not clock source.
>> It will be used as a hardware broadcast event source.
>>
>> There's no call to sched_clock_register in mtk_timer.c, so it can't be
>> the sched clock, so you need to fix the commit log.
>
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> Sorry for late reply.
>
> For sched_clock_register, please see
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2015-July/001547.html
> which was accepted in
> https://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/clockevents/4.4
>
The commit message makes no sense to me. The counters should continue to
work as long as they are in always-on domain. Only timers are lost
when you enter deeper idle states. So I agree with using MTK timer as
broadcast timer/eventsource. You still didn't answer what's the need
to use MTK timer as sched clocksource ?
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists