[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1443672762-982936-17-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:12:26 -0400
From: green@...uxhacker.ru
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 16/32] staging/lustre/ldlm: Remove ldlm_glimpse_ast()
From: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
Only used on the server.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm.h | 1 -
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c | 28 ----------------------
2 files changed, 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm.h
index 432222b..8b2b092 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm.h
@@ -1282,7 +1282,6 @@ int ldlm_expired_completion_wait(void *data);
int ldlm_blocking_ast_nocheck(struct ldlm_lock *lock);
int ldlm_blocking_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct ldlm_lock_desc *desc,
void *data, int flag);
-int ldlm_glimpse_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, void *reqp);
int ldlm_completion_ast_async(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 flags, void *data);
int ldlm_completion_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 flags, void *data);
/** @} ldlm_local_ast */
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
index c73661c..a9159fd 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
@@ -358,34 +358,6 @@ int ldlm_blocking_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct ldlm_lock_desc *desc,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ldlm_blocking_ast);
-/**
- * ->l_glimpse_ast() for DLM extent locks acquired on the server-side. See
- * comment in filter_intent_policy() on why you may need this.
- */
-int ldlm_glimpse_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, void *reqp)
-{
- /*
- * Returning -ELDLM_NO_LOCK_DATA actually works, but the reason for
- * that is rather subtle: with OST-side locking, it may so happen that
- * _all_ extent locks are held by the OST. If client wants to obtain
- * current file size it calls ll{,u}_glimpse_size(), and (as locks are
- * on the server), dummy glimpse callback fires and does
- * nothing. Client still receives correct file size due to the
- * following fragment in filter_intent_policy():
- *
- * rc = l->l_glimpse_ast(l, NULL); // this will update the LVB
- * if (rc != 0 && res->lr_namespace->ns_lvbo &&
- * res->lr_namespace->ns_lvbo->lvbo_update) {
- * res->lr_namespace->ns_lvbo->lvbo_update(res, NULL, 0, 1);
- * }
- *
- * that is, after glimpse_ast() fails, filter_lvbo_update() runs, and
- * returns correct file size to the client.
- */
- return -ELDLM_NO_LOCK_DATA;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(ldlm_glimpse_ast);
-
static void failed_lock_cleanup(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
struct ldlm_lock *lock, int mode)
{
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists