linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 13/23] x86/asm/crypto: Create stack frames in aesni-intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151001175113.GC4269@treble.redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:51:13 -0500
From:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:	Mathias Krause <minipli@...linux.so>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>,
	Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 13/23] x86/asm/crypto: Create stack frames in
 aesni-intel_asm.S

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 07:36:54PM +0200, Mathias Krause wrote:
> On Do, Okt 01, 2015 at 08:29:50 -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 08:10:26AM +0200, minipli@...linux.so wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:47:04AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > >  ENTRY(aesni_set_key)
> > > > +	FRAME_BEGIN
> > > >  #ifndef __x86_64__
> > > >  	pushl KEYP
> > > >  	movl 8(%esp), KEYP		# ctx
> > > 
> > > This will break 32 bit builds using the aesni-intel.ko module. You need
> > > to adjust the esp-based offsets for the non-x86_64 case, as FRAME_BEGIN
> > > may do another push.
> > > 
> > > How about adding a FRAME_OFFSET() macro to <asm/frame.h> to wrap the
> > > offsets?:
> > > 
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> > > # define FRAME_OFFSET(x)	((x) + (BITS_PER_LONG / 8))
> > > #else
> > > # define FRAME_OFFSET(x)	(x)
> > > #endif
> > > 
> > > And using them like this:
> > > 
> > > 	movl FRAME_OFFSET(8)(%esp), KEYP		# ctx
> > 
> > Ah, right.  The 32-bit ABI passes arguments on the stack instead of via
> > registers.
> > 
> > For now, I'm inclined to just make FRAME_BEGIN and FRAME_END do nothing
> > on 32-bit.  We're only doing stack validation on x86_64 and I don't know
> > if anybody cares about frame pointers on 32-bit at this point.
> 
> Well, we had issues in the past, especially in that very module, but
> only on 32 bit systems. So it would be nice to get frame pointers right
> for 32 bit, too.

Ok, I'll make your suggested changes for this file with FRAME_OFFSET.

(But note that stacktool doesn't currently support 32 bit so it won't
detect any frame pointer issues in 32 bit code.)

-- 
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/