linux-kernel - [PATCH V15 02/11] x86/intel_rapl: Modify hot cpu notification handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1443766185-61618-3-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Date:	Thu,  1 Oct 2015 23:09:36 -0700
From:	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To:	"H Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"x86" <x86@...nel.org>, "Fenghua Yu" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	"Vikas Shivappa" <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V15 02/11] x86/intel_rapl: Modify hot cpu notification handling

 - In rapl_cpu_init, use the existing package<->core map instead of
 looping through all cpus in rapl_cpumask.

 - In rapl_cpu_exit, use the same mapping instead of looping all online
 cpus. In large systems with large number of cpus the time taken to
 loop may be expensive and also the time increase linearly.

Signed-off-by: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c | 35 ++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
index 81431c0..eeec6b8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
@@ -136,6 +136,12 @@ static struct pmu rapl_pmu_class;
 static cpumask_t rapl_cpu_mask;
 static int rapl_cntr_mask;
 
+/*
+ * Temporary cpumask used during hot cpu notificaiton handling. The usage
+ * is serialized by hot cpu locks.
+ */
+static cpumask_t tmp_cpumask;
+
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rapl_pmu *, rapl_pmu);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rapl_pmu *, rapl_pmu_to_free);
 
@@ -539,18 +545,16 @@ static struct pmu rapl_pmu_class = {
 static void rapl_cpu_exit(int cpu)
 {
 	struct rapl_pmu *pmu = per_cpu(rapl_pmu, cpu);
-	int i, phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
 	int target = -1;
+	int i;
 
 	/* find a new cpu on same package */
-	for_each_online_cpu(i) {
-		if (i == cpu)
-			continue;
-		if (phys_id == topology_physical_package_id(i)) {
-			target = i;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
+	cpumask_and(&tmp_cpumask, topology_core_cpumask(cpu), cpu_online_mask);
+	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &tmp_cpumask);
+	i = cpumask_any(&tmp_cpumask);
+	if (i < nr_cpu_ids)
+		target = i;
+
 	/*
 	 * clear cpu from cpumask
 	 * if was set in cpumask and still some cpu on package,
@@ -572,15 +576,10 @@ static void rapl_cpu_exit(int cpu)
 
 static void rapl_cpu_init(int cpu)
 {
-	int i, phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
-
-	/* check if phys_is is already covered */
-	for_each_cpu(i, &rapl_cpu_mask) {
-		if (phys_id == topology_physical_package_id(i))
-			return;
-	}
-	/* was not found, so add it */
-	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &rapl_cpu_mask);
+	/* check if cpu's package is already covered.If not, add it.*/
+	cpumask_and(&tmp_cpumask, &rapl_cpu_mask, topology_core_cpumask(cpu));
+	if (cpumask_empty(&tmp_cpumask))
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &rapl_cpu_mask);
 }
 
 static __init void rapl_hsw_server_quirk(void)
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/