[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wpv6ru42.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 00:33:39 +0000
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
CC: Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Simon <horms@...ge.net.au>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: OF DMAEngine API based on CONFIG_DMA_OF instead of CONFIG_OF
Hi Vinod, Mark
> > > > > 5fa422c ("dmaengine: move drivers/of/dma.c -> drivers/dma/of-dma.c")
> > > > > moved OF base DMAEngine code to of-dma.c, then it based on CONFIG_DMA_OF.
> > > > > But, OF base DMAEngine API on of_dma.h still based on CONFIG_OF now.
> > > > > So, current kernel can't find OF base DMAEngine API if .config has CONFIG_OF,
> > > > > but not have CONFIG_DMA_OF. This patch tidyup it.
> > > >
> > > > I did a quick build with arm config, but didn't see any failures. But still
> > > > am worried about random config and other builds may find.
> > > >
> > > > So I think it would be safer to merge this patch after merge window so that
> > > > we have ample time to fix any issue
> >
> > Which branch can I find this patch ?
>
> Sorry I missed to do this after merge window. Applied now
Thank you
>> Mark
Now Vinod's branch (= vinod/topic/of) has this patch
Can you please check [2/2] patch which is related to it
[PATCH 2/2] ASoC: rsnd: SND_SOC_RCAR doesn't depend on DMA_OF
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists