[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151002070841.GP4919@axis.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:08:41 +0200
From: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>
To: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>
Cc: rabin@....in, jespern@...s.com, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
ziegler@...fau.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CRIS v32: leftover references on ETRAX_VIRTUAL_GPIO
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 08:57:22AM +0200, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
> Hi Rabin,
Hi!
> your commit ("CRIS v32: remove old GPIO and LEDs code") is in today's
> linux-next tree (i.e., 20151002). Among other Kconfig options, the
> commit removes ETRAX_VIRTUAL_GPIO but leaves the following references in
> the code:
>
> 0 arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/setup.c 132 #ifdef CONFIG_ETRAX_VIRTUAL_GPIO
> 1 arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/setup.c 149 #ifdef CONFIG_ETRAX_VIRTUAL_GPIO
> 2 arch/cris/arch-v32/mach-fs/Kconfig 197 depends on ETRAX_VIRTUAL_GPIO
> 3 arch/cris/arch-v32/mach-fs/Kconfig 208 depends on ETRAX_VIRTUAL_GPIO
> 4 arch/cris/include/uapi/asm/etraxgpio.h 59 #ifdef CONFIG_ETRAX_VIRTUAL_GPIO
> 5 arch/cris/include/uapi/asm/etraxgpio.h 74 #ifdef CONFIG_ETRAX_VIRTUAL_GPIO
>
> Is it intentional or just an accident?
I'm guessing it's an accident, I did have some trouble applying that
particular patch and I had to verify the patch by hand, but I might
have made a mistake and removed something that Rabin didn't remove.
(Since I knew this symbol was tightly connected to the CRIS gpio)
Anyways, I'll roll a patch for removing them, thanks for the heads-up!
/Jesper
> I found the issue with scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py.
>
> Kind regards,
> Valentin
/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
--
Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@...s.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists