linux-kernel - Re: rwx mapping between ex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151002071907.GB2159@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:19:07 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rwx mapping between ex_table and rodata


* Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> >> > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> >> > > @@ -1132,7 +1132,7 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
> >> > >          * has been zapped already via cleanup_highmem().
> >> > >          */
> >> > >         all_end = roundup((unsigned long)_brk_end, PMD_SIZE);
> >> > > -       set_memory_nx(rodata_start, (all_end - rodata_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> >> > > +       set_memory_nx(text_end, (all_end - text_end) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> >> > >
> >> > >         rodata_test();
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > That should work, yeah. I'd still like to find the default permissions and
> >> > make them W+nx, though. Regardless, let's get the above added.
> >>
> >> The default permissions are set at boot time when setting up the early page
> >> tables. When we split them up later on we inherit the PTE bits and then we do
> >> that _ro/nx cleanup after the overall layout has been settled.
> >>
> >> We can't make them W+nx in the early setup without shooting ourself in the foot,
> >> because we only set up at the pud/pmd level.
> >
> > So I think at minimum we should do a (debug) scan in late init, of the whole
> > range, for any leftover WX permissions? That would have caught this bug. (and
> > might catch other existing bugs that might occur with various configs/hw-layouts.)
> 
> I think this would be great. I'd like to disassociate it from PTDUMP,
> though, since that exposes kernel address to userspace. It'd be nice
> to have the check without also the debugfs entry.

Yeah, so it could still use pretty much the same code, except no registry in 
/debug?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/