[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <560E4B76.40504@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:16:38 +0300
From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
CC: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
<linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<skinsbursky@...tuozzo.com>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockd: create NSM handles per net namespace
On 10/01/2015 09:26 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 07:36:19PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> On 09/29/2015 09:47 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:49:29PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>>>> Commit cb7323fffa85 ("lockd: create and use per-net NSM
>>>> RPC clients on MON/UNMON requests") introduced per-net
>>>> NSM RPC clients. Unfortunately this doesn't make any sense
>>>> without per-net nsm_handle.
>>>
>>> Makes sense to me. Is anyone doing testing to make sure we've got this
>>> right now?
>>>
>>> (For example, have you reproduced the below problem and verified that
>>> it's fixed after this patch?)
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that NULL-ptr was actually hit, so I've fixed it with this patch.
>
> Great, thanks. I'm queuing this up for 4.4 in the nfsd tree (assuming
> that's OK with Trond).
>
> How extensively have you tested containerized nfs (client or server
> side) at this point?
We have some tests for that, but we don't run them on upstream kernels,
only on OpenVZ.
> Have you seen any other issues?
>
None, so far.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists