[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <560E603E.8080603@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:45:18 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] rtc: pl031: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
On 02/10/15 11:40, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>
>> The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag is used to identify the interrupts that should
>> be left enabled so as to allow them to work as expected during the
>> suspend-resume cycle, but doesn't guarantee that it will wake the system
>> from a suspended state, enable_irq_wake is recommended to be used for
>> the wakeup.
>>
>> This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags and uses newly
>> introduce PM wakeup APIs dev_pm_{set,clear}_wake_irq.
>>
>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
>> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
>> Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>
> Looks correct to me.
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
Thanks, while you are at it, do you know what interrupt stv2_pl031
shares so that I can fix the TODO in the comment or the code(whichever
applicable).
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists